Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 21 - 30 of 41
State of California et al v Wheeler We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2020cv03005
Plaintiff: State of North Carolina, State of Maryland, City of New York and others
Defendant: Andrew Wheeler, R. D. James, United States Army Corps of Engineers and others
Amicus Curiae: Duarte Nursery, Inc., North American Lake Management Society, Society for Ecological Restoration and others
Intervenor Defendant: State of Alaska, State of Nebraska, State of Texas and others
Petitioner: National Cattlemen's Beef Association, American Road and Transportation Builders Association, Edison Electric Institute and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Benjamin Barber v. State of Oregon, et al
as 20-35051
Defendant / Appellee: STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO, STATE OF LOUISIANA and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: BENJAMIN BARBER
Defendant: SIMON, Hon. Judge; For the US District Court for the District of Oregon and ACOSTA, Hon. Judge; For the US District Court for the District of Oregon
Barber v. State of Oregon et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2019cv01631
Defendant: Hon. Judge Simon, Attorney General of North Carolina, Attorney General of West Virginia and others
Plaintiff: Benjamin Barber
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
State of California, et al v. U.S. Bureau of Land Management, et al
as 18-15711
Plaintiff - Appellee: STATE OF CALIFORNIA, by and through Xavier Becerra, Attorney General, CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD, STATE OF NEW MEXICO, by and through, Hector Balderas, Attorney General and others
Defendant - Appellant: U.S. BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT, KATHARINE S. MACGREGOR, in her official capacity as Acting Assistant Secretary for Land and Minerals Management, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR and others
Intervenor-Defendant: STATE OF TEXAS, STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA, AMERICAN PETROLEUM INSTITUTE and others
George Artem v. State of North Dakota, et al
as 18-35250
Plaintiff - Appellant: GEORGE ARTEM
Defendant - Appellee: STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA, county of Morton, BISMARCK-MANDAN PUBLIC DEFENDER, JOSH PASTIR and others
State of California et al v. Teikoku Seiyaku Co., Ltd. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2018cv00675
Plaintiff: State of California , State of Alabama , State of Arkansas and others
Defendant: Teikoku Seiyaku Co., Ltd. and Teikoku Pharma USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
State of California et al v. Bureau of Land Management et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2017cv07186
Plaintiff: State of California , California Air Resources Board , State of New Mexico and others
Defendant: Bureau of Land Management , Katharine S. MacGregor and Ryan Zinke
Intervenor: Western Energy Alliance and Independent Petroleum Association of America
Intervenor_dft: American Petroleum Institute , Texas and State of North Dakota
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Leiss v. Secretary of the State of North Dakota We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2017cv01936
Plaintiff: Curtis B. Leiss
Defendant: Secretary of the State of North Dakota
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
National Association of Wheat Growers et al v. Zeise et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2017cv02401
Plaintiff: Associated Industries of Missouri, Agribusiness Association of Iowa, National Corn Growers Association and others
Defendant: Xavier Becerra and Lauren Zeise
Amicus Curiae: State of Iowa, State of Indiana, The National Health Federation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Artem v. State of North Dakota et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2017cv00798
Plaintiff: George Artem
Defendant: State of North Dakota and Bismarck-Mandan Public Defender
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?