Cases filed in the Fifth Circuit Courts
Cases 51 - 60 of 81
Blake v. State of Oklahoma, District Court of Payne County
as 5:2017cv00076
Plaintiff: Andre E. W. Blake, Jr.
Defendant: State of Oklahoma, District Court of Payne County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Natl Federation of Indep Bus, et al v. Thomas Perez, Secretary, et al
as 17-10054
Plaintiff - Appellee: NATIONAL FEDERATION OF INDEPENDENT BUSINESS, TEXAS ASSOCIATION OF BUSINESS, LUBBOCK CHAMBER OF COMMERCE and others
Intervenor Plaintiff - Appellee: STATE OF TEXAS, STATE OF ARKANSAS, STATE OF ALABAMA and others
Intervenor Defendant - Appellee: STATE OF OKLAHOMA
Defendant - Appellant: THOMAS E. PEREZ, SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, ANDREW D. AUERBACH and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
State of Nevada, et al v. LABR, et al
as 16-41606
Plaintiff - Appellee: STATE OF NEVADA, STATE OF TEXAS, STATE OF ALABAMA and others
Defendant - Appellant: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, THOMAS E. PEREZ, SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, In his official capacity as United States Secretary of Labor, WAGE AND HOUR DIVISION OF THE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR and others
State of Texas, et al v. USA, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-11534
Plaintiff - Appellee: STATE OF TEXAS, HARROLD INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT (TX), STATE OF ALABAMA and others
Defendant - Appellant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, JOHN B. KING, in his Official Capacity as United States Secretary of Education and others
Movant - Appellant: RACHEL JONA TUDOR, Dr.
State of Arizona et al v. National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA) et al
as 3:2016cv00274
Plaintiff: State of Arizona , State Of Texas , State of Oklahoma and others
Defendant: National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA) , UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , United States Department of Commerce and others
Amicu: Internet Association, et al.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
State of Nevada et al v. United States Department of Labor et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2016cv00731
Plaintiff: State of Nevada , State of Texas , State of Alabama and others
Defendant: United States Department of Labor, Thomas E Perez, Wage and Hour Division of the Department of Labor The and others
Consol_plaintiff: Plano Chamber of Commerce , Texas Association of Business , Allen-Fairview Chamber of Commerce and others
Consol_defendant: Thomas E Perez , David Weil and U.S. Department of Labor
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
State of Nevada et al v. United States Department of Labor et al
as 1:2016cv00407
Plaintiff: State of Nevada , State Of Texas , State of Alabama and others
Defendant: United States Department of Labor, Thomas E. Perez, The Wage and Hour Division of the Department of Labor and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
State of Texas, et al v. USA, et al
as 16-40796
Plaintiff - Appellee: STATE OF TEXAS, STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OF GEORGIA and others
Defendant - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JEH CHARLES JOHNSON, SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, R. GIL KERLIKOWSKE, Commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border Protection and others
Intervenor - Appellant: JANE DOE #1, JANE DOE #2 and JANE DOE #3
State of Texas, et al. v. United States of America, et al. Featured Case
as 7:2016cv00054
Plaintiff: State of Texas, State of Kentucky, State of Tennessee and others
Defendant: United States of America, United States Department of Education, United States Department of Justice and others
Amicus Curiae: Governor C. L. "Butch" Otter, State of Washington, Letitia James, Public Advocate for the City of New York and others
Petitioner: Dr. Rachel Jona Tudor, GLBTQ Legal Advocates & Defenders, Charlsa Suzanne Little and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Dario Izaguirre v. State of Oklahoma
as 16-10574
Plaintiff - Appellant: DARIO IZAGUIRRE
Defendant - Appellee: STATE OF OKLAHOMA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?