Cases 21 - 30 of 6,045
BURTON v. TERRA et al
as 2:2024cv01579
Petitioner:
LAFENUS BURTON
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT JOSEPH TERRA, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF DELAWARE and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
PROPER v. THOMPSON
as 1:2024cv00102
Petitioner:
STUART J. PROPER
Respondent:
SUPT. THOMPSON and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WHITE v. BROTHERS et al
as 2:2024cv01331
Petitioner:
ZAHMIR WHITE
Respondent:
MARK BROTHERS and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Allied Shipyard, Inc. v. Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania
as 2:2024cv00760
Plaintiff:
Allied Shipyard Inc
Defendant:
Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
HYMAN v. WARDEN OF SCI HOUTZDALE et al
as 2:2024cv01194
Petitioner:
JAVON HYMAN
Respondent:
WARDEN OF SCI HOUTZDALE, DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HARPER v. BRITTAIN et al
as 2:2024cv01182
Petitioner:
IRVIN HARPER
Respondent:
K. BRITTAIN, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HYMAN v. WARDEN OF SCI HOUTZDALE et al
as 3:2024cv00055
Petitioner:
JAVON HYMAN
Respondent:
WARDEN, DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ARMSTRONG v. STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2024cv01080
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR O. ARMSTRONG
Defendant:
STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PHILADELPHIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
United States of America for the use and benefit of Norco Manufacturing Corp v. Core Tech International Corporation et al
as 2:2024cv00298
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FOR THE USE AND BENEFIT OF NORCO MANUFACTURING CORP. d/b/a/ NORCO INDUSTRIAL DOORS and United States of America for the use and benefit of Norco Manufacturing Corp doing business as Norco Industrial Doors
Defendant:
CORE TECH INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, AMEC ENVIRONMENT & INFRASTRUCTURE, INC, Zurich American Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
ROBINSON v. WAHL et al
as 2:2024cv00963
Petitioner:
FARUQ ROBINSON
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT MARK WAHL, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
