Cases filed in Texas
Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Curcio v. CCS Medical Inc et al
as 3:2023cv01579
Plaintiff: Frederick D Curcio, IV, United States of America, State of California and others
Defendant: CCS Medical Inc, DEGC Enterprises (US) Inc, Highland Capital Management LP and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3730 Qui Tam False Claims Act
Velayas v. State of Maryland et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv00493
Plaintiff: Kelly Michael Velayas
Defendant: State of Maryland, State of Virginia, State of West Virginia and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
State of Utah et al v. Walsh et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv00016
Not Classified By Court: State of Iowa
Plaintiff: State of Utah, State of Texas, Commonwealth of Virginia and others
Defendant: Martin Walsh, Secretary of Labor, U. S. Department of Labor and Martin J Walsh
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
State of Texas et al v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2023cv00007
Plaintiff: State of Alabama, State of Alaska, State of Arkansas and others
Defendant: U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services and others
Amicus Curiae: Immigration Reform Law Institute
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine et al v. U.S. Food and Drug Administration et al Featured Case We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv00223
Plaintiff: Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine, American Association of Pro-Life Obstetricians & Gynecologists, American College of Pediatricians and others
Defendant: U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Robert M. Califf, M.D., Janet Woodcock, M.D. and others
Intervenor Defendant: Danco Laboratories, LLC and Danco Laboratories LLC
Amicus Curiae: The Chattanooga National Memorial for the Unborn, Doctors for America, American Center for Law and Justice and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Hankerd v. State of Tennessee et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2019cv00195
Defendant: Federal Bureau of Investigation and State of Tennessee
Plaintiff: Kendra Hankerd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674
Polansky et al v. Executive Health Resources Inc. et al
as 1:2018mc00331
Interested Party: Cohen Milstein Sellers & Toll PLLC
Defendant: Executive Health Resources Inc.
Movant: M.D., M.P.H. Jesse Polansky and United States of America
Plaintiff: M.D., M.P.H. Jesse Polansky, The Commonwealth of Massachusetts, The Commonwealth of Virginia and others
Respondent: Seton Medical Center
Cause Of Action: Motion to Compel
Chihi et al v. Catholic Health Initiatives et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2018cv00123
Plaintiff: Hichem Chihi, United States of America, The State of Texas and others
Defendant: Catholic Health Initiatives, Chi-St. Luke's Health, Baylor College of Medicine and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3730 Qui Tam False Claims Act
Kennedy v. The State of Alabama et al
as 5:2016cv01116
Defendant: Democratic National Party, Republican National Party, State of Connecticut and others
Plaintiff: Stephen Kennedy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
State of Texas, et al. v. United States of America, et al. Featured Case
as 7:2016cv00054
Plaintiff: State of Texas, State of Kentucky, State of Tennessee and others
Defendant: United States of America, United States Department of Education, United States Department of Justice and others
Amicus Curiae: Governor C. L. "Butch" Otter, State of Washington, Letitia James, Public Advocate for the City of New York and others
Petitioner: Dr. Rachel Jona Tudor, GLBTQ Legal Advocates & Defenders, Charlsa Suzanne Little and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?