Cases 31 - 40 of 144
Field v. State of West Virginia et al
as 1:2020cv00280
Plaintiff:
Dale P. Field, Jr.
Defendant:
John Doe #1, Bryan Kelly Lanham, State of West Virginia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Field v. State of West Virginia et al
as 1:2020cv00804
Plaintiff:
Dale P. Field, Jr.
Defendant:
John Doe #1, Bryan Kelly Lanham, State of West Virginia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00388
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Patterson v. State of West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeal et al
as 5:2020cv00094
Defendant:
Department of Correction, St. Marys Correctional Center, Governor Office and others
Plaintiff:
Clarke D. Patterson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clervrain v. Hoover et al
as 3:2020cv00068
Defendant:
United States District Court for the District of California, United States Department Office of the Labor, State of Hawaii Office of the Secretary and others
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McArthur v. State of West Virginia
as 2:2020cv00208
Plaintiff:
Terrence Antoine McArthur
Defendant:
State of West Virginia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McArthur v. State of West Virginia
as 2:2020cv00204
Plaintiff:
Cyrus J. Mali
Defendant:
CSAA General Insurance Company
Respondent:
State of West Virginia
Petitioner:
Terrence A. McArthur
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Cecil v. State of West Virginia et al
as 3:2020cv00044
Defendant:
Tim Hot, Judy Goontz and State of West Virginia
Plaintiff:
Daniel Lee Cecil
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cecil v. State of West Virginia
as 5:2020cv00042
Plaintiff:
Daniel Lee Cecil
Defendant:
State of West Virginia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Downey v. Maston
as 2:2020cv00153
Respondent:
State of West Virginia and Russell Maston
Petitioner:
James Michael Downey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
