Cases 1 - 10 of 43
Jenkins v. Bradley County District Attorney et al
as 3:2023cv00034
Plaintiff:
Eric Jenkins
Defendant:
Bradley County District Attorney, Stephen Crump and April Romero
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
David Frazier v. Stephen Crump, et al
as 19-5709
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN DOE, CAROLL ROSS, Judge, WILLIAM ARCHER and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID TRAVIS FRAZIER
Crump v. Dart et al
as 1:2017cv03467
Plaintiff:
Stephen Crump
Defendant:
Thomas Dart and Doctor Paul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
David Frazier v. Stephen Crump, et al
as 16-6687
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID T. FRAZIER
Defendant - Appellee:
STEPHEN CRUMP, Former ADA, JERRY ESTES, District Attorney, CAROLL ROSS, Judge and others
Defendant:
SARAH BORING, et al
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00258
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv05154
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Stephen Crump v. California Dept. of Corrections
as 2:2009cv02634
Plaintiff:
Stephen Crump
Defendant:
California Dept. of Corrections, A. Carlson, Correctional Officer at R&R Department and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Forma Pauperis Denial
Stephen Crump v. Kirk Gaston, et al
as 09-15237
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEPHEN CRUMP, AKA Steve Crump
Defendant - Appellee:
KIRK GASTON, Chief of Police, San Francisco State University, ROBERT A. CORRIGAN, President of San Francisco State University, PENNY SCAFFOLD, President of Student Affairs, San Francisco State University and others
Crump v. Dean et al
as 3:2009cv00022
Plaintiff:
Stephen Crump
Defendant:
Dean, Pollard, G. Maresh and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Stephen Crump v. Alameda County Superior Court
as 08-17766
Petitioner - Appellant:
STEPHEN CRUMP
Respondent - Appellee:
ALAMEDA COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
