Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 32
STRAUSER v. STEPHEN L. LAFRANCE HOLDINGS, INC., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020mc00005
Defendant: STEPHEN L. LAFRANCE PHARMACY, INC.,, STEPHEN L. LAFRANCE HOLDINGS, INC., and WALGREEN CO.
Plaintiff: J. DOUGLAS STRAUSER
Respondent: CENTERS FOR MEDICARE AND MEDICAID SERVICES
Walgreen Co. et al v. Wyeth, Inc. et al
as 3:2019cv08965
Plaintiff: Meijer Distribution Inc., PAINTERS DISTRICT COUNCIL NO. 30 HEALTH & WELFARE FUND, STEPHEN L. LAFRANCE HOLDINGS, INC. and others
Defendant: WYETH PHARMACEUTICALS INC, WYETH, INC., WYETH LLC and others
3Rd Party Defendant: APOTEX CORP.
In Re: Effexor XR Antitrust Litigation
Interested Party: A.F. of L. -- AGC Building Trades Welfare Plan
Walgreen Co. et al v. Wyeth, Inc. et al
as 0:2019mc60417
Plaintiff: Meijer Distribution Inc., IBEW -- NECA Local 505 Health & Welfare Plan, PAINTERS DISTRICT COUNCIL NO. 30 HEALTH & WELFARE FUND and others
3Rd Party Defendant: Apotex Corp.
Defendant: Wyeth LLC, Wyeth Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Wyeth-Whitehall Pharmaceuticals and others
In Re: Effexor XR Antitrust Litigation
Strauser et al v. Stephen L LaFrance Holdings Inc et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2018cv00673
Defendant: Jarco Pharmacies Inc, Stephen L. LaFrance Holdings, Inc., Stephen L. LaFrance Pharmacy, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: J Douglas Strauser, State of Tennessee, State of New Jersey and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
In Re: Modafinil AntiTrust, et al, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 15-3475
Plaintiff - Appellee: J M SMITH CORP, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated doing business as Smith Drug Company, MEIJER INC, MEIJER DISTRIBUTION INC and others
Defendant - Appellee: CEPHALON INC, TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LTD, TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA INC and others
Defendant - Appellant: MYLAN LABORATORIES INC, RANBAXY LABORATORIES LTD, RANBAXY PHARMACEUTICALS INC and others
Stephen L. LaFrance Holdings,, et al v. Astellas Pharma US, Inc.
as 15-1290
Plaintiff - Appellee: BURLINGTON DRUG COMPANY INC., JUDITH CARRASQUILLO, on her behalf and on behalf of all others similarly situated, STEPHEN L. LAFRANCE HOLDINGS, INC., a/k/a SAJ Distributors and others
Defendant - Appellant: ASTELLAS PHARMA US, INC.
Movant: CHRISTOPHER DONNELLY, CHRISTOPHER WIRTH, JIMMY JAMES THULE and others
Interested Party: COVINGTON & BURLING LLP
Effexor XR Antitrust We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 15-1274
Plaintiff - Appellant: PROFESSIONAL DRUG CO, ROCHESTER DRUG CO-OP, STEPHEN L LAFRANCE HOLDINGS INC and others
Defendant - Appellee: WYETH INC, TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA INC, TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LTD and others
Astellas Pharma US, Inc. v. Stephen L. LaFrance Holdings,, et al
as 14-8023
Petitioner: ASTELLAS PHARMA US, INC.
Respondent: STEPHEN L. LAFRANCE HOLDINGS, INC., a/k/a SAJ Distributors, STEPHEN L. LAFRANCE PHARMACY, INC., a/k/a SAJ Distributors, BURLINGTON DRUG COMPANY INC. and others
Movant: CHRISTOPHER DONNELLY, CHRISTOPHER WIRTH, JIMMY JAMES THULE and others
Interested Party: COVINGTON & BURLING LLP
Stephen L. LaFrance Holding Inc., et al v. National Milk Producers Federation, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2012cv04142
Plaintiff: STEPHEN L. LAFRANCE HOLDING INC. and STEPHEN L. LAFRANCE PHARMACY, INC.
Defendant: National Milk Producers Federation , Cooperatives Working Together , Dairy Farmers of America, Inc., and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Stephen L. LaFrance Pharmacy, Inc. v King Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et. al. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2012cv00163
Plaintiff: Stephen L. LaFrance Pharmacy, Inc. and Stephen L. LaFrance Holdings, Inc.
Defendant: King Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Mutual Pharmaceutical Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?