Cases 21 - 30 of 54
James Smith, et al v. General Motors, LLC
as 19-1614
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANIEL MCFARLAND, STEVE GROSS, KELLI BYRNES and others
Defendant / Appellee:
GENERAL MOTORS, LLC
Carchex, LLC v. Ian Chado
as 19-228
Respondent:
MARCELLUS BROTHERS, KAREN BOWERS, IRA LEWIS and others
Petitioner:
CARCHEX, LLC
Stephen Young v. Scott Sprader
as 19-1523
Petitioner / Appellant:
STEPHEN YOUNG
Respondent / Appellee:
SCOTT SPRADER, Warden
D'Angelo v. Bank of Dene et al
as 2:2018cv00073
Defendant:
Bank of Dene, Prime Business Services, Inc. and Michael Stephen Young
Plaintiff:
Joseph D'Angelo
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Smith et al v. General Motors, LLC
as 2:2017cv14146
Plaintiff:
Marissa Little, Rob Nestore, Emily Couch and others
Defendant:
General Motors Company, LLC and General Motors, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Omarley Hudson v. Attorney General United State
as 17-3329
Petitioner:
OMARLEY CURNANDY HUDSON, AKA Hudson O'Maley, AKA Shelby Clark, AKA Stephen Young, AKA Shelby Hernandez Clark
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Chado et al v. National Auto Inspections, LLC
as 1:2017cv02945
Plaintiff:
William Rush, Ian Chado, Nancy Nguyen and others
Defendant:
National Auto Inspections, LLC, Jason Goldsmith and Carchex, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Bank of America, N.A. v. Harris et al
as 1:2017cv01201
Plaintiff:
Bank of America, N.A.
Defendant:
James L. Harris, Stephen Young, Tommie L. Lowery, Jr. and others
Cross_claimant:
Branch Banking & Trust Co.
Cross_defendant:
Jermani Nance, James L. Harris, JN Enterprises, LLC and others
Counter_claimant:
Branch Banking & Trust Co.
Counter_defendant:
Bank of America, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2410
Miller v. Klee et al
as 2:2017cv11006
Plaintiff:
Tony Miller
Defendant:
Paul Klee, Nickolas Leslie, Herb Brighton and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
