Cases 1 - 10 of 64
Stepp v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
as 1:2024cv00040
Plaintiff:
Gerald Stepp
Defendant:
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Benitez v. Stallworth et al
as 5:2023cv00084
Plaintiff:
Alessandra Stepp Benitez
Defendant:
Samerial Stallworth and Midwest Logistics Systems LTD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Stepp v. Otis Elevator Company
as 2:2023cv01738
Plaintiff:
Denise Stepp
Defendant:
Otis Elevator Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Stepp v. Otis Elevator Company
as 2:2023cv01739
Plaintiff:
Denise Stepp
Defendant:
Otis Elevator Company, John Doe Corporations, John Doe Business Entities and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Stepp v. Otis Elevator Company
as 2:2023oe01738
Plaintiff:
Denise Stepp
Defendant:
Otis Elevator Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Stepp v. Estate of Cheryl Nye et al
as 2:2022cv03972
Plaintiff:
Ernest Stepp
Defendant:
Gary Nye, Erie Insurance Company and Estate of Cheryl Nye
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle Product Liability
Randall McElhaney v. Dustin Williams, et al
as 22-5903
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RANDALL MCELHANEY
Defendant / Appellee:
DUSTIN WILLIAMS, WILLIAM STEPP, NATHAN BROWN and others
Stepp v. Mazza
as 0:2022cv00076
Petitioner:
Chad Aaron Stepp
Respondent:
Warden Kevin Mazza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stepp v. Huntley et al
as 1:2022cv00851
Plaintiff:
Brenda Lee Stepp
Defendant:
Andrea Huntley and Chris Huntley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Stepp v. Mazza
as 3:2022cv00368
Petitioner:
Chad Aaron Stepp
Respondent:
Warden Kevin Mazza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
