Cases 31 - 40 of 65
Stepp v. Unknown Christian County Jail Employees
as 5:2015cv00039
Plaintiff:
Terrence L. Stepp
Defendant:
Unknown Christian County Jail Employees
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv00606
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Effinger #184295 v. Vest et al
as 1:2014cv00423
Plaintiff:
John W. Effinger #184295, III
Defendant:
R. Vest, L. Maki and Tina Stepp
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
VanDiver v. Prison Health Services, Inc et al
as 2:2014cv11236
Plaintiff:
Jerry VanDiver
Defendant:
Prison Health Services, Inc, John Steele, Badawi Abdellatif and others
Caver #200563 v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2014cv00171
Plaintiff:
Larry Terrill Caver #200563
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, Access Securpak Company, Narcotics Analysis Reagent Mark II Kit Company and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dixon #210062 v. Morrison et al
as 1:2013cv01078
Plaintiff:
Marcael Mario Dixon #210062
Defendant:
B. Morrison, Unknown Lockwood, Unknown Stepp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Charlie Macon v. Larry Bryan, et al
as 13-1675
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLIE BERNARD MACON
Defendant - Appellee:
LARRY BRYAN, C O, UNKNOWN MORRISON, LT., THOMAS WATSON, Captain and others
Stepp v. Medina City School District Board of Education et al
as 1:2013cv01126
Plaintiff:
Randolph S. Stepp
Defendant:
Medina City School District Board of Education , Karla Robinson , Susan Vlcek and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Faber #216481 v. Stepp et al
as 1:2013cv00516
Plaintiff:
Dennis R. Faber #216481
Defendant:
Tina Stepp and Thomas Watson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ramon Russell v. Fred Lockwood, et al
as 13-1453
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RAMON L. RUSSELL
Defendant - Appellee:
FRED LOCKWOOD, Deputy Warden, UNKNOWN COX, C/O, TINA STEPP, Grievance Coordinator and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
