Cases 11 - 20 of 30
Feller et al v. West Bloomfield, Township of, et al
as 2:2010cv12590
Plaintiff:
Leonid Feller and Lisa Feller
Defendant:
West Bloomfield, Township of, Erik Beauchamp, John Roda and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
William Fowler, et al v. Steve Burns, et al
as 10-5703
Plaintiff - Appellee:
WILLIAM D. FOWLER and LINDA A. FOWLER
Defendant:
STEVE BURNS, et al.
Defendant - Appellant:
BUDDY RANDOLPH, James "Buddy" Randolph, MIKE FINCHER and JOHN HUFFINE
Thornburgh v. Greene County Sheriff's Department et al
as 2:2009cv00141
Plaintiff:
Lisa Thornburgh
Defendant:
Greene County Sheriff's Department, Steve Burns, Neil Matthews and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Warner v. Burns et al
as 2:2009cv00091
Plaintiff:
Chad Warner
Defendant:
Steve Burns and Neal Matthews
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Black v. Burns et al
as 2:2009cv00084
Plaintiff:
James W Black, III
Defendant:
Steve Burns, Neal Matthews and Susan Cristen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morris v. Burns et al
as 2:2009cv00078
Plaintiff:
Michael J Morris
Defendant:
Steve Burns, Neal Matthews and Susan Christen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hale v. Burns et al
as 2:2009cv00012
Plaintiff:
Phillip D Hale
Defendant:
Steve Burns, Robert Mathis, Aron Spears and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Robinette v. Greene County et al
as 2:2008cv00337
Plaintiff:
Vonda Robinette
Defendant:
Greene County, Steve Burns, Terry Rader and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Marshall v. Burns et al
as 2:2008cv00331
Plaintiff:
Daniel H Marshall
Defendant:
Steve Burns, Neil Mathews and Ryan Ward
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Colvin v. Burns et al
as 2:2008cv00276
Plaintiff:
Michael E Colvin
Defendant:
Steve Burns, Neil Matthews, Matthews and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
