Cases 1 - 9 of 9
USA v. Steve Kang
as 21-2292
Plaintiff / Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellee:
STEVE YOUNG KANG, a/k/a Kang, Steven Young; a/k/a Kang, Young Tae
Kino Bonelli v. Grand Canyon University, et al
as 20-17415
Defendant:
WILEY, Sergeant, M. GRUPE, Officer, JOE YAHNER and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KINO BONELLI
Defendant / Appellee:
GRAND CANYON UNIVERSITY, GRAND CANYON EDUCATION INCORPORATED, BRIAN MUELLER and others
Tompkins v. Department of Veterans Affairs et al
as 5:2018cv01251
Defendant:
Kristopher Wade Vlosich, Robert Wilkie, Department of Veterans Affairs and others
Plaintiff:
John Tompkins
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Bailey v. University of Oxford et al
as 3:2015cv00436
Plaintiff:
Jay Bailey
Defendant:
University of Oxford, University of Cambridge, The Dons of Oxford and Cambridge and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Miller v. Butterfield et al
as 1:2012cv00077
Plaintiff:
Gil A. Miller
Defendant:
Jacob Butterfield, Gerd Young, Steve Young and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0754
Winters et al v. Banner Health Incorporated et al
as 2:2011cv01537
Plaintiff:
Amber Winters , Jackie Abbott , Lucas Smith and others
Defendant:
Banner Health Incorporated, Catholic Healthcare West, Scottsdale Healthcare Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Ramada Worldwide Inc. v. Kim et al
as 4:2010mc00028
Plaintiff:
Ramada Worldwide Inc.
Defendant:
Steve Young Kim and Young Soon Kim
Steve Young et al v. Global NAPs Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv01984
Petitioner:
Steve Young, Southern New England Telephone Company and Southern New England Telephone Company
Respondent:
Global NAPs Inc., Global NAPs New Hampshire, Inc., Global Naps Networks, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Champion, et al v. Homa, et al
as 3:2003cv00275
Plaintiff:
Alabama Plaintiffs , California Plaintiffs , Colorado Plaintiffs and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
