Cases 1 - 9 of 9
LaHue et al v. Smith et al
as 2:2023cv02141
Plaintiff:
Vonnah Lee LaHue and Robert Asah LaHue
Defendant:
Diane K. Smith, Steven Robert Anderson, Charles Droege and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Werahera v. Regents of the University of Colorado, The et al
as 1:2021cv02776
Plaintiff:
Priya N. Werahera
Defendant:
Regents of the University of Colorado, The, Ann Thor, Ann (I) Thor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carrasquillo v. City of Oak Creek Wisconsin et al
as 2:2018cv00124
Plaintiff:
Guillermo Carrasquillo
Defendant:
City of Oak Creek Wisconsin , Steven J Anderson and Ann Golombowski
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Knox v. City of Tuscaloosa et al
as 7:2016cv01560
Plaintiff:
Ronald Knox
Defendant:
City of Tuscaloosa , Steven D Anderson , Brad Mason and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Huth v. Hubble et al
as 5:2014cv01215
Plaintiff:
Irvin W. Huth
Defendant:
Rebecca Hubble , Village of Bolivar , Mark Myers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Roebling v. City of Tuscaloosa, AL et al
as 7:2014cv00151
Plaintiff:
Mary Gabrielle Roebling
Defendant:
City of Tuscaloosa, AL, Thomas A Burroughs, J.R. Mason and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Scarbrough v. Tuscaloosa, Alabama, City of, The et al
as 7:2013cv00418
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Scarbrough
Defendant:
Tuscaloosa, Alabama, City of, The, Walter Maddox, Steven D Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv01365
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Craviotto v. Walkers Office, et al
as 2:2001cv00025
Plaintiff:
Dennis Craviotto
Defendant:
Walkers Office Supply Inc and Steven G as Trustee for the Steven G Anderson Trust dated
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
