Cases 1 - 10 of 24
FINK v. MCMAHON et al
as 1:2026cv02702
Plaintiff:
STEVEN FINK
Defendant:
LINDA MCMAHON and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 7101 Labor-Management Relations
Coyle et al v. Mito Smith Haven Inc.
as 1:2025cv06859
Plaintiff:
Katrina Coyle, Jackelyne Garcia Cruz and Steven Fink
Defendant:
Mito Smith Haven Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Amburgey et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2025cv12482
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Amburgey, Derek Alexander, Donald Ames and others
Defendant:
3M Company, DUPONT DE NEMOURS INC., f/k/a DOWDUPONT, INC., CHEMOURS COMPANY FC, L.LC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
FINK v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2024vv01620
Petitioner:
STEVEN FINK
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
Fink v. Salmonsen et al
as 9:2022cv00011
Petitioner:
Chris Steven Fink
Respondent:
Jim Salmonsen and Attorney General of the State of Montana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Fink v. State of Montana
as 1:2021cv00107
Petitioner:
Chris Steven Fink
Respondent:
State of Montana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Fink v. MT State Parole Board Employees
as 6:2021cv00077
Plaintiff:
Chris Steven Fink
Defendant:
MT State Parole Board Employees
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fink v. State of Montana
as 1:2021cv00070
Plaintiff:
Chris Steven Fink
Defendant:
State of Montana
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Luscher et al v. Mitsubishi Electric Corporation
as 3:2017cv04067
Plaintiff:
Brian Luscher , Simon Lee , Jeffrey Figone and others
Defendant:
Mitsubishi Electric Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Fink v. Kirkegard et al
as 6:2016cv00109
Petitioner:
Chris Steven Fink
Respondent:
Leroy Kirkegard and Attorney General of the State of Montana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
