Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Halvorsen, et al v. Cox, et al
as 26-4018
Plaintiff:
TRACIE HALVORSEN, NANCY INMAN, STEVEN HUBER and others
Defendant:
SPENCER COX, DEIDRE M. HENDERSON, CURTIS BRAMBLE and others
Huber v. Romero, et al
as 26-4009
Plaintiff:
STEVEN HUBER
Defendant:
CECILIA M. ROMERO, individually and in her official capacity as Magistrate Judge for the United States District Court for the District of Utah, CHRISTOPHER M. WOLPERT, individually and in his official capacity as Clerk of the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit, ANNE E. RICE, individually and in her official capacity as Assistant United States Attorney and others
Huber v. Romero et al
as 2:2025cv01098
Plaintiff:
Steven Huber
Defendant:
Judge Cecilia M. Romero, Christopher M. Wolpert, Anne E. Rice and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Halvorsen et al v. Cox et al
as 2:2025cv00909
Plaintiff:
Tracie Halvorsen, Nancy Inman, Steven Huber and others
Defendant:
Spencer Cox, Deidre Henderson, Curtis Bramble and others
Petitioner:
Richard M. Fleming
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
In re: Huber
as 25-4109
Petitioner:
STEVEN HUBER
Respondent:
UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT and others
Huber v. United States Government et al
as 2:2025cv00592
Plaintiff:
Steven Huber
Defendant:
United States Government, Bureau of Land Management, Elija Waters and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2409 (a) Quiet Title Action
Huber et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation et al
as 2:2017cv03516
Plaintiff:
Pamela Huber and Steven Huber
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation and American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Huber Farms General Partnership et al v. United States of America
as 3:2011mc00004
Petitioner:
Huber Farms General Partnership , Steven Huber , Duane Huber and others
Respondent:
United States of America
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
