Cases 1 - 10 of 10
M Tee Enterprises, Inc. et al v. Stock Loan Services, LLC et al
as 3:2009cv02044
Plaintiff:
M Tee Enterprises, Inc., Michael Thomas, Rothwell-Myers Limited and others
Defendant:
Stock Loan Services, LLC, Stock Building Supply, Inc., Jim Major and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Regions Bank v. College Avenue Development LLC et al
as 8:2009cv01095
Plaintiff:
Regions Bank and Regions Bank
Defendant:
College Avenue Development LLC, TDA Development LLC, Raulston L Travis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv00891
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2008cv02433
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv00319
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Street v. Stock Building Supply, Inc.
as 8:2008cv00090
Plaintiff:
David Street
Defendant:
Stock Building Supply, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv02334
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Jackman v. Stock Building Supply Inc
as 4:2007cv02621
Plaintiff:
Sherrie S Jackman
Defendant:
Stock Building Supply Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Owens v. Stock Building Supply Inc
as 3:2007cv00905
Plaintiff:
Pamela Owens, Pamela Owens and Pamela Owens
Defendant:
Stock Building Supply Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Fowler v. United States, et al
as 0:2005cv61628
Plaintiff:
James Fowler
Defendant:
United States, Michelet Isnadin and Stock Building Supply, inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
