Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 584
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2023cv80400
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2023cv80371
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-10444
Plaintiff / Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Ronald Emrit v. Charles Barkley, et al
as 23-1275
Plaintiff / Appellant: RONALD SATISH EMRIT
Defendant: CHARLES BARKLEY, FANDUEL and SUBWAY
Ronald Emrit v. Charles Barkley, et al
as 23-1276
Plaintiff / Appellant: RONALD SATISH EMRIT
Defendant / Appellee: CHARLES BARKLEY, SUBWAY and FANDUEL
Ronald Emrit v. Charles Barkley, et al
as 23-1271
Plaintiff / Appellant: RONALD SATISH EMRIT
Defendant / Appellee: CHARLES BARKLEY, SUBWAY and FANDUEL
Ebrahimi v. Fields et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2023cv00273
Plaintiff: Shamim Ebrahimi
Defendant: Michael R. Fields, Netflix, Inc., Electronic Arts, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Emrit v. Barkley et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv00027
Plaintiff: Ronald Satish Emrit
Defendant: Charles Barkley, Subway and Fanduel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Interstate Commerce Act
Emrit v. Barkley et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2023cv00079
Plaintiff: Ronald Satish Emrit
Defendant: Charles Barkley, Subway and FanDuel
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
EMRIT v. BARKLEY et al
as 2:2023cv00034
Plaintiff: RONALD SATISH EMRIT
Defendant: CHARLES BARKLEY, SUBWAY and FANDUEL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?