Cases 41 - 48 of 48
Shaw v. Inficare Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv07843
Plaintiff:
Brett Shaw
Defendant:
Inficare Inc. , Inficare Services, LLC , Inficare Technologies and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Innova Healthcare, LLP v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Texas, et al
as 5:2010cv00256
Defendant:
Barbara Barsch, Blue Cross Blue Shield of Texas, Sharon Brown and others
Plaintiff:
Innova Healthcare, LLP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal - ERISA
Flynn et al v. Coachmen Industries, Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv08284
Plaintiff:
Sumer M. Flynn, Sumer M. Flynn, Sumer M. Flynn and others
Defendant:
Coachmen Industries, Inc., Coachmen Recreational Vehicles of Georgia, LLC, Coachmen Recreational Vehicle Company, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Galloway v. Buchanan County Sheriff's Dept. et al
as 5:2009cv06113
Defendant:
Buchanan County Sheriff's Dept. and Tiger Parsons
Plaintiff:
Sumer Galloway
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ashford et al v. Homes of Merit, Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv05603
Plaintiff:
Angela Suzette Ashford, Angela Suzette Ashford, Angela Suzette Ashford and others
Defendant:
Homes of Merit, Inc., CH2M Hill Constructors, Inc., Bechtel National Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Ashford et al v. Homes of Merit, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv00469
Plaintiff:
Angela Suzette Ashford, Cynthia N. Bone, Sumer R. Bone and others
Defendant:
Homes of Merit, Inc., CH2M Hill Constructors, Inc., Bechtel National, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Field v. Robertson et al
as 5:2008cv00406
Plaintiff:
Trent T Field
Defendant:
Keith Robertson, Pam Robertson, Michael Jones and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Lloyd Sumers Tickell, Jr. v. Ametek, Inc., et al.
as MSS/1:06-CV-00350
Plaintiff:
Lloyd Sumers Tickell, Jr.
Defendant:
Ametek, Inc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
