Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 31
McCarthy, et al. v. Intercontinental Exchange, Inc., et al.
as 23-3458
Plaintiff / Appellant: LISA MCCARTHY, MARY KATHERINE ARCELL, KEITH DEAN BRADT and others
Defendant / Appellee: INTERCONTINENTAL EXCHANGE, INC., INTERCONTINENTAL EXCHANGE HOLDINGS, INC., ICE BENCHMARK ADMINISTRATION LIMITED and others
Defendant: ROYAL BANK OF CANADA, RBC CAPITAL MARKETS, LLC and THE NORINCHUKIN BANK
T. et al v. Sumitomo Mitsui Banking et al
as 4:2023cv00055
Plaintiff: Massimo T., Karin D. and S. T.
Defendant: Sumitomo Mitsui Banking and Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation Welfare Benefit Plan, The
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Silicon Valley Bank v. JES Global Capital GP III, LLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv02552
Plaintiff: Silicon Valley Bank
Defendant: Elliot S. Smerling and JES Global Capital GP III, LLC
Not Classified By Court: Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 bc
Laydon v. Mizuho Bank, Ltd.
as 20-3775
Defendant: JPMorgan Chase & Co., HSBC Holdings PLC, Lloyds Banking Group PLC and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: Jeffrey Laydon, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellant: Societe Generale, Cooperatieve Rabobank U.A. and Barclays Bank PLC
Intervenor: California State Teachers' Retirement System
Plaintiff: Oklahoma Police Pension and Retirement System and Stephen P. Sullivan
Laydon v. Mizuho Bank, Ltd.
as 20-3626
Defendant: Rabobank Group, Citigroup Global Markets Japan, Inc., The Norinchukin Bank and others
Defendant / Appellee: Deutsche Bank AG, RBS Securities Japan Limited, R.P. Martin Holdings Limited and others
Plaintiff: Oklahoma Police Pension and Retirement System and Stephen P. Sullivan
Intervenor: California State Teachers' Retirement System
Plaintiff / Appellant: Jeffrey Laydon, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated
McCarthy et al v. Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2020cv05832
Plaintiff: Brenda Davis, Pamela Faust, Sondra Russell and others
Defendant: Intercontinental Exchange Holdings, Inc., J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, Coperatieve Rabobank U.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15
IN RE: ICE LIBOR ANTITRUST LIT
as 20-1492
Plaintiff / Appellant: City of Livonia Retiree Health amd Disability Benefits Plan, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Hawaii Sheet Metal Workers Annuity Fund, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, City of Livonia Employees' Retirement System and others
Defendant / Appellee: Merill Lynch, Pierce Fenner & Smith Inc., MUFG Bank, Ltd., The Norinchukin Bank and others
Amicus Curiae: American Antitrust Institute
Hawaii Sheet Metal Workers Health & Welfare Fund et al v. Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv02002
Defendant: Lloyds Securities Inc., Citigroup Global Markets Inc., BNP Paribas SA and others
Plaintiff: Hawaii Sheet Metal Workers Training Fund, Hawaii Sheet Metal Workers Pension Fund, Hawaii Sheet Metal Workers Health & Welfare Fund and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
City of Livonia Employees' Retirement System et al v. Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv00965
Defendant: Lloyds Securities Inc., Citigroup Global Markets Inc., BNP Paribas SA and others
Plaintiff: City of Livonia Retiree Health and Disability Benefits Plan and City of Livonia Employees' Retirement System
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
IN RE: ICE LIBOR ANTITRUST LITIGATION We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv00439
Defendant: Lloyds Securities Inc., Merrill Lynch, Pierce Fenner & Smith Inc., BNP Paribas SA and others
Plaintiff: Putnam Bank
Consolidated Plaintiff: City of Livonia Employees' Retirement System, City of Livonia Retiree Health and Disability Benefits Plan, Hawaii Sheet Metal Workers Training Fund and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?