Cases 1 - 10 of 216
Sivak v. Friedland, et al.
as 24-1350
Plaintiff:
LACEY SIVAK
Defendant:
MICHELLE T. FRIEDLAND, CIRCUIT JUDGE and JENNIFER SUNG, CIRCUIT JUDGE
In re Naturalization Ceremony 03/13/24
as 5:2024mc80052
Not Yet Classified:
Naturalization Ceremony, Refal Hussein Ali Al Mhaoush, Damon Jay Civin and others
Chien-Min Sung v. EHWA USA, Inc.
as 8:2024mc00006
Petitioner:
Dr. Chien-Min Sung
Respondent:
EHWA USA, Inc.
TOTAL GREEN TROPICALS, INC. v. HI MOM ENTERPRISES, LLC d/b/a SARAGA INTERNATIONAL GROCERY et al
as 1:2024cv00256
Plaintiff:
TOTAL GREEN TROPICALS, INC.
Defendant:
HI MOM ENTERPRISES, LLC. d/b/a SARAGA INTERNATIONAL GROCERY, BONG JAE SUNG and HI MOM ENTERPRISES, LLC d/b/a SARAGA INTERNATIONAL GROCERY
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 499 Agricultural Commodities Act
In re: Chien-Min Sung Subpoena Upon 3M Company
as 0:2023mc00104
In Re:
Chien-Min Sung
Petitioner:
3M Company
Board of Trustees of Leland Stanford University v. Chungyan Chan, et al
as 23-16077
Plaintiff / Appellee:
THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY
Defendant / Appellant:
CHUNGYAN CHAN, an Individual, AKA James Chan
Defendant / Appellee:
ACADEMIA HISTORICA
Defendant:
CHIANG FANG CHI-YI, an individual, AKA Elizabeth Chiang, CHIANG YO-MEI, an individual, AKA Yo-Mei Chiang, CHIANG HSIAO-CHANG, an individual, AKA Amy Chiang and others
SUN TAIYANG CO., LTD. v. DAE DO INC. et al
as 2:2023cv03614
Plaintiff:
SUN TAIYANG CO., LTD.
Defendant:
DAE DO INC., MINSOO CHO, SUNG CHAN HONG and others
ILOODA CO., LTD et al v. SERENDIA LLC
as 1:2023mc00044
Plaintiff:
LUTRONIC AESTHETICS, INC., ILOODA CO., LTD, SUNG HWAN E&B CO., doing business as SHENB CO. LTD and others
Defendant:
SERENDIA LLC
The State of Georgia v. Kim
as 1:2023cv00113
Plaintiff:
The State of Georgia
Defendant:
Sung H Kim
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal - Suit against Federal Officer
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
