Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00920
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv01705
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00506
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
McCullough v. Luxottica Retail North America, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv00232
Plaintiff:
Alexander McCullough
Defendant:
Luxottica Retail North America, Inc. and Sunglass Hut Trading, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jones et al v. Sunglass Hut Trading LLC
as 1:2016cv08630
Plaintiff:
Nancy Jones and Robert Gibbs
Defendant:
Sunglass Hut Trading LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv05732
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv04467
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Parallel Networks, LLC v. Abercrombie & Fitch Co. et al
as 6:2012cv00018
Plaintiff:
Parallel Networks, LLC
Defendant:
Abercrombie & Fitch Co. , Amazon.com, Inc. , The Gap Inc and others
Counter_defendant:
Parallel Networks, LLC
Counter_claimant:
Netflix, Inc. , Office Depot, Inc. , The Gap Inc and others
Mediator:
Robert Faulkner
Consol_defendant:
Barnes & Noble, Inc. , barnesandnoble.com, LLC , Brawn, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv02825
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Parallel Networks, LLC v. Adidas America, Inc. et al
as 6:2010cv00491
Defendant:
Victoria's Secret Direct Brand Management, LLC, bergdorfgoodman.com, LLC, Gillette Company The and others
Plaintiff:
Parallel Networks, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
