Cases 71 - 80 of 223
Ankeney v. Jones, et al
as 12-1422
Petitioner - Appellant:
RANDAL ANKENEY
Respondent - Appellee:
SUSAN JONES, Warden of Fremont Correctional Facility, TOM CLEMENTS, Director of the Colorado Department of Corrections (CDOC) and JOHN SUTHERS, The Attorney General of the State of Colorado
Jones et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2012cv06913
Plaintiff:
Susan Jones and Kevin Jones
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Sayed v. Jones et al
as 1:2012cv02019
Petitioner:
Hazhar A. Sayed
Respondent:
Susan Jones and Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Apodaca v. Jones
as 1:2012cv01905
Petitioner:
Leo Apodaca
Respondent:
Susan Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Jones et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv02797
Plaintiff:
Susan Jones and Hubert Jones
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon Women's Health and Urology, Gynecare and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tejan v. Jones
as 1:2012cv01156
Plaintiff:
Joshua Tejan
Defendant:
Susan Jones, Joe Ortiz, Aristedes Zavaras and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Oakley v. Zavaras, et al
as 12-1178
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JACOB OAKLEY
Defendant - Appellee:
ARISTEDES ZAVARAS, Executive Director and SUSAN JONES, Warden, CCF/CSP
Palecek v. Jones, et al
as 12-1177
Petitioner - Appellant:
PAUL PALECEK
Respondent - Appellee:
SUSAN JONES, Warden, Colorado State Penitentiary and JOHN W. SUTHERS, the Attorney General of the State of Colorado
Penrod v. Quick, et al
as 12-1163
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DONALD ADAM PENROD
Defendant - Appellee:
DON QUICK, Adams County D.A., SUSAN JONES, Warden CSP, TOM CLEMENTS, Executive Director, Colorado Department of Corrections and others
Pettigrew v. Zavaras, et al
as 12-1146
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RYAN ALEXANDER PETTIGREW
Defendant - Appellee:
ARISTEDES ZAVARAS, Executive Director, SUSAN JONES, Warden, LARRY REED, Warden and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
