Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Mawule Tepe v. USA, et al
as 23-6086
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MAWULE TEPE
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, CURTIS L. COLLIER, United States District Court Judge, KATHERINE A. CRYTZER, United States District Court Judge and others
Hugunin v. Lee
as 4:2023cv00891
Plaintiff:
Harvey William Hugunin
Defendant:
Susan K Lee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Mawule Tepe v. USA, et al
as 23-5593
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MAWULE TEPE
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, CURTIS L. COLLIER, United States District Court Judge, KATHERINE A. CRYTZER, United States District Court Judge and others
Mawule Tepe v. USA, et al
as 23-5188
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MAWULE TEPE
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, CURTIS L. COLLIER, United States District Court Judge, KATHERINE A. CRYTZER, United States Magistrate Judge and others
Tepe v. United States
as 1:2022cv00275
Plaintiff:
Mawule Tepe
Defendant:
United States, Curtis L Collier, Katherine A. Crytzer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Henderson v. Sell et al
as 1:2020cv00139
Defendant:
Neal Pinkston, Chattanooga, TN Housing Authority, Andrew Basler and others
Plaintiff:
Ernest Henderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robert Modrall v. Susan Lee, et al
as 15-5931
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT GREGORY MODRALL
Defendant - Appellee:
SUSAN K. LEE, United States Magistrate Judge
Modrall v. Lee
as 1:2015cv00155
Plaintiff:
Robert G Modrall
Defendant:
Susan K Lee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Modrall v. Killian et al (PLR2)
as 1:2014cv00327
Plaintiff:
Robert G Modrall
Defendant:
William C Killian, Bill Haslam, Claude Ramsey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Modrall v. Carter et al
as 1:2014cv00257
Plaintiff:
Robert G Modrall
Defendant:
William B Carter, Susan K Lee, Bob Corker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
