Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv08077
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Swanson v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 2:2023cv02129
Plaintiff:
Kathlene Leemarie Swanson
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Uber USA LLC v. Cooper et al
as 2:2019cv04955
Defendant:
Tiffany Swanson-Cooper and Brian Cooper
Plaintiff:
Uber USA LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Swanson v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2019cv04298
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Olecia Swanson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Swanson v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2019cv02937
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Olecia Swanson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wood v. Phillips et al
as 2:2019cv01259
Defendant:
Maricopa Integrated Health Systems, Scott D Swanson, Graham Phillips and others
Plaintiff:
Brandon Mykel Wood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hagins et al v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2018cv03342
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Hiram Hagins and Melanie Swanson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ziegenfuss v. Arizona, State of et al
as 2:2017cv04503
Plaintiff:
James Norman Ziegenfuss, Jr.
Defendant:
Arizona, State of, Debra Lynne Swanson, Rafael Lopez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Swanson v. Colvin
as 4:2015cv00549
Plaintiff:
Carrie Deneise Swanson
Defendant:
Carolyn W Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Cagle #079874 v. Dupnik et al
as 2:2014cv02616
Plaintiff:
Shaine Carl Cagle
Defendant:
Clarence Dupnik, Unknown Party, Charles L Ryan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
