Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Johns v. Synchrony Lending, Inc.
as 4:2022cv00762
Plaintiff:
Tina M. Johns
Defendant:
Synchrony Lending, Inc. doing business as Synchrony Bank
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv03564
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2021cv01155
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv02316
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Lerner & Rowe Injury Attorneys v. Cosme et al
as 2:2020cv00465
Defendant:
Synchrony Lending, Inc., Rausch, Sturm, Israel, Enerson & Hornik, LLP, Arquidemes Cosme and others
Plaintiff:
Lerner & Rowe Injury Attorneys
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv06461
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Robinson v. Great Plains Lending, LLC et al
as 2:2018cv01763
Plaintiff:
Donald R. Robinson
Defendant:
Great Plains Lending, LLC, Synchrony Lending, Inc. and Trans Union LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv01730
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Ochoa v. Equifax Information Services LLC et al
as 2:2018cv01343
Plaintiff:
Ramon Ochoa
Defendant:
First Electronic Bank, Equifax Information Services LLC, Synchrony Lending, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Collins v. Synchrony Financial et al
as 3:2018cv00241
Plaintiff:
Gregory Collins
Defendant:
Synchrony Lending, Inc and DOES 1-20
Counter_claimant:
Synchrony Lending, Inc
Counter_defendant:
Gregory Collins
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
