Cases 1 - 10 of 22
COLEMAN v. CORIZON MEDICAL et al
as 2:2018cv04611
Plaintiff:
SHALIK COLEMAN
Defendant:
CORIZON MEDICAL, UNION COUNTY JAIL, SYLVIA COOPER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith & Nephew, Inc. v. Rea
as 12-1343
Appellant:
SMITH & NEPHEW, INC.
Appellee:
DAVID J. KAPPOS, DIRECTOR, U.S. PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE, SYNTHES (U.S.A.) and TERESA STANEK REA, Acting Director, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
Breen v. Synthes U.S.A., LLC et al
as 1:2012cv00911
Plaintiff:
John Breen
Defendant:
Synthes U.S.A., LLC , Synthes Maxillofacial, Inc. , Synthes North America, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Burkett et al v. Synthes (U.S.A.) et al
as 1:2012cv00246
Plaintiff:
Rodney M. Burkett and Brenda Lee Burkett
Defendant:
Synthes (U.S.A.) , Synthes Spine Company, LP , Synthes, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Yohnka v. Synthes (U.S.A.)
as 1:2009cv05147
Defendant:
Synthes (U.S.A.)
Plaintiff:
Barbara Yohnka
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Carroll v. Synthes U.S.A. et al
as 3:2009cv03175
Plaintiff:
Mark Carroll
Defendant:
Synthes U.S.A., Synthes North America Inc and Synthes Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Henson v. Synthes (U.S.A.)
as 1:2009at00072
Plaintiff:
Norman F. Henson
Defendant:
Synthes (U.S.A.)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Beirne v. Synthes (U.S.A) et al
as 1:2008cv02762
Plaintiff:
Chris Beirne
Defendant:
Synthes (U.S.A), Synthes Spine Company, L.P. and Norian Corporation
Counter Defendant:
Crosslink Orthopaedics, LLC, Sean Summers and Paul Petosa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Petosa v. Synthes (U.S.A.) et al
as 1:2008cv02763
Plaintiff:
Paul Petosa
Defendant:
Synthes (U.S.A.), Synthes Spine Company, L.P. and Norian Corporation
Counter Defendant:
Chris Beirne, Sean Summers and Crosslink Orthopaedics, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
