Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Scott v. Gibson et al
as 4:2024cv00387
Plaintiff:
Deverick Scott
Defendant:
James Gibson, Shipman, Brandon Carroll and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Arkansas Division of Correction et al
as 4:2023cv00051
Plaintiff:
Deverick Scott
Defendant:
Arkansas Division of Correction, B Carroll, Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DUNLAP v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv21883
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA T DUNLAP
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
McCranie v. Dunlap
as 4:2022cv00050
Plaintiff:
Michael Lee McCranie
Defendant:
Tashalia T Dunlap
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Deverick Scott v. Arkansas Div. of Corrections, et al
as 21-1956
Defendant / Appellee:
Rodney Brown, Lieutenant, VSM Unit, Laquista Swopes, Sergeant, VSM Unit, Smallwood, Business Manager, VSM Unit and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Deverick Scott
Scott v. Arkansas Division of Corrections et al
as 4:2021cv00055
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Mahoney, Marshall Reed and others
Plaintiff:
Deverick Scott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Covert v. Payne et al
as 4:2020cv01170
Defendant:
Mahoney, T Dunlap, M Reed and others
Plaintiff:
Harold Moses Covert
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bowden v. Dunlap et al
as 3:2019cv00906
Defendant:
T Dunlap, John Doe, M Butikis and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher J Bowden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Takesha Dunlap v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., et al
as 17-11361
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TAKESHA T. DUNLAP, also known as Takesha Bell
Defendant - Appellee:
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., WELLS FARGO HOME MORTGAGE, MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INCORPORATED and others
Dunlap v. PrimeLending, a PlainsCapital Company et al
as 4:2016cv00258
Plaintiff:
Takesha T Dunlap
Defendant:
PrimeLending, a PlainsCapital Company and Wells Fargo Bank NA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
