Cases 11 - 20 of 25
Carroll v. Paramo et al
as 3:2015cv02426
Plaintiff:
T. Carroll
Defendant:
Paramo and Orozsco
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James Biggins v. C. Danberg, et al
as 15-1384
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES ARTHUR BIGGINS
Defendant - Appellee:
C. DANBERG, T. CARROLL, R. KEARNEY and others
Martinez v. Rahimi et al
as 1:2014cv01000
Petitioner:
Jose Martinez
Respondent:
. Rahimi , Ezell Shaw , . Nash and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Cedric Nickerson v. J. Mooneyham, et al
as 12-10977
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CEDRIC NICKERSON
Defendant - Appellee:
J. MOONEYHAM, TOMMY NORWOOD, D HORTON and others
Abreu v. Farley
as 11-3533
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Carlos Abreu
Defendant - Appellee:
Eric Farley, Correction Officer at Five Points Correctional Facility, Kyler Kennedy, Correction Officer at Five Points Correctional Facility, Barry Countryman, Correction Officer at Five Points Correctional Facility and others
Abreu v. Farley, et al.
as 6:2011cv06251
Plaintiff:
Carlos Abreu
Defendant:
Eric Farley, Robert Maloy, Kyler Kennedy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cedric Nickerson v. J. Mooneyham, et al
as 11-10228
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CEDRIC NICKERSON
Defendant - Appellee:
J MOONEYHAM, TOMMY NORWOOD, D HORTON and others
Biggins v. Danberg et al
as 1:2009cv00862
Plaintiff:
James Arthur Biggins
Defendant:
C. Danberg, T. Carroll, R. Kearney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nickerson v. Mooneyham et al
as 7:2009cv00082
Plaintiff:
Cedric Nickerson
Defendant:
J Mooneyham, Tommy Norwood, D Horton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nickerson v. Crites, et al
as 08-40827
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CEDRIC NICKERSON
Defendant - Appellee:
RICHARD CRITES, McConnell Unit, J MOONEYHAM, Thomas Havins State Jail, Brownwood, TX, STATE CLASSIFICATION COMMITTEE, TDCJ Huntsville, TX and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
