Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Phoebus Apollo v. Tracy Beltz, et al
as 23-2659
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Phoebus P. Apollo, also known as Archbishop Kingpimp Shortymacnifisent
Defendant / Appellee:
Tracy Beltz, Chad Mitsch, Bao Nyguyen and others
Harrington v. The Ontario County Sheriff's Office et al
as 6:2021cv06638
Plaintiff:
Wyatt T. Harrington
Defendant:
The Ontario County Sheriff's Office, Lee Martin and Emma E. Drown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harrington v. The Ontario County Sheriff's Office et al
as 6:2021cv06634
Plaintiff:
Wyatt T. Harrington
Defendant:
The Ontario County Sheriff's Office, Lee Martin and Emma E. Drown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2019cv02616
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
United States of America v. Harrington et al
as 2:2019cv02236
Defendant:
Luke T. Harrington, Holly A. Harrington, Luke Trent Harrington and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Johnny Sloan, Jr. v. Debbie Asuncion, et al
as 19-15728
Defendant / Appellee:
D. TYLER, L. M. PENNISI, Jr., T. SHELBY and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHNNY L. SLOAN, Jr.
Harrington v. CCDOC et al
as 1:2018cv03889
Plaintiff:
Bennie T Harrington
Defendant:
CCDOC and Cook County Department of Correctional
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harrington v. People of the State of Illinois et al
as 1:2018cv03585
Defendant:
People of the State of Illinois and Kat Jones
Plaintiff:
Bennie T. Harrington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harrington v. Jones
as 1:2018cv03586
Plaintiff:
Bennie T Harrington
Defendant:
Kathaleen Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Amador et al v. Wolfe et al
as 5:2017cv00683
Plaintiff:
Gregorio Amador and Ashley Lasoya
Defendant:
Bexar County, Bexar County Sheriff's Office, Officer L. Diamond and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
