Cases 1 - 10 of 19
NAYLOR v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv13878
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL T NAYLOR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
John A. Frilando v. Director Timothy Johnson
as 15-7780
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN A. FRILANDO, a/k/a John Frilando, a/k/a John Anthony Frilando
Defendant - Appellee:
DIRECTOR TIMOTHY JOHNSON, Acting Warden, ASSOCIATE WARDEN LANKFORD, UNIT MANAGER R. KEYS and others
John Frilando v. Director Timothy Johnson
as 14-7492
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN ANTHONY FRILANDO, a/k/a John Frilando, a/k/a John A. Frilando
Defendant - Appellee:
DIRECTOR TIMOTHY JOHNSON, Acting Warden, ASSOCIATE WARDEN LANKFORD, UNIT MANAGER R. KEYS and others
Frilando v. Johnson et al
as 4:2013cv02931
Plaintiff:
John A Frilando
Defendant:
Timothy Johnson, Warden Lankford, R Keys and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Winding v. Ovalle et al
as 4:2013cv00117
Plaintiff:
James C. Winding
Defendant:
F. Ovalle, F. Rice, MTC, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Winding v. Lard et al
as 4:2013cv00078
Defendant:
V. Lard, J. Webb, L. Prude and others
Plaintiff:
James C. Winding
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McClain v. Lard et al
as 4:2013cv00077
Plaintiff:
Nigel McClain
Defendant:
V. Lard, J. Webb, L. Prude and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Frilando v. United States of America, et al
as 1:2013cv01173
Plaintiff:
John A. Frilando
Defendant:
Hotl, Timothy Johnson, Lankford and others
Winding v. Shaw et al
as 4:2013cv00054
Plaintiff:
James Winding
Defendant:
F. Shaw, R. Rice, F. Ovalle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Winding v. MTC, Inc. et al
as 4:2013cv00032
Plaintiff:
James Winding
Defendant:
MTC, Inc., H. Hollie, T. Naylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
