Cases 21 - 30 of 30
McCaul v. Heatwol et al
as 7:2011cv00113
Defendant:
Nurse Heatwol, Kathy Schwartz and T. Walton
Plaintiff:
Scott Andrew McCaul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCaul v. Heatwol et al
as 1:2011cv00204
Plaintiff:
Scott Andrew McCaul
Defendant:
Heatwol, Kathy Schwartz and T. Walton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Sindram v. Douglas Robelen
as 11-1093
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL J. SINDRAM
Defendant - Appellee:
DOUGLAS B. ROBELEN, State Actor, GERALD BRUCE LEE, PHYLLIS T. WALTON and others
Defendant:
PATRICIA L. HARRINGTON
Hendricks v. Sears et al
as 2:2010cv00620
Plaintiff:
Irvin Hendricks, Jr.
Defendant:
K. Sears, Lt. Lester, T. Walton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Sindram v. Patricia Harrington
as 10-2293
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL J. SINDRAM
Defendant - Appellee:
PATRICIA L. HARRINGTON, DOUGLAS B. ROBELEN, State Actor, GERALD BRUCE LEE and others
Michael Sindram v. Patricia Harrington
as 10-2073
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL J. SINDRAM
Defendant - Appellee:
PATRICIA L. HARRINGTON, DOUGLAS B. ROBELEN, State Actor, GERALD BRUCE LEE and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2010cv00734
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1080
Stevens v. Rockingham Regional Jail et al
as 7:2009cv00378
Plaintiff:
Brian Stevens
Defendant:
Rockingham Regional Jail, Donald W. Farley, Steven Shortell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rivers v. Rockingham-Harrisonburg Jail et al
as 7:2009cv00351
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Tyree Rivers
Defendant:
Rockingham-Harrisonburg Jail, Donald Farley, T. Walton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walton v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner
as 6:2009cv00981
Plaintiff:
James T Walton
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
