Cases 1 - 10 of 86
Powell v. Smyrna Police Department et al
as 1:2024cv01921
Plaintiff:
Kenroy-Kevon Powell
Defendant:
Smyrna Police Department, T.S. Cooper, M.O. Hudson and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01016
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00765
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 IDEA: Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (short title)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv10017
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1415 IDEA: Challenge decision re education for handicapped
W et al v. IPS
as 1:2023cv01991
Plaintiff:
L W, T S, L.W. and others
Defendant:
IPS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-55709
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
T.S. et al v. City of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2023cv06334
Plaintiff:
T.S., Shameka Moore, Takarra Smith and others
Defendant:
City of Los Angeles, Joseph Zizzo, Nicolas Alejandre and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03217
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Amy Sherlock, et al v. Gina Austin, et al
as 23-55018
Plaintiff / Appellant:
AMY SHERLOCK, on her own behalf and on behalf of her minor children, T.S. and S.S
Plaintiff:
ANDREW FLORES, an individual
Defendant / Appellee:
GINA M. AUSTIN, an individual, AUSTIN LEGAL GROUP APC, a California Corporation, JOEL R. WOHLFEIL, an individual and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-3057
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
