Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Filing Error
as 1:2024sf65230
Plaintiff:
Tammy Smith
Defendant:
Indivior Inc., Indivior Solutions, Inc., Indivior PLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Smith v. Indivior Inc. et al.
as 1:2024sf65076
Plaintiff:
Tammy Smith
Defendant:
Indivior Inc., Indivior Solutions, Inc., Indivior PLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Pickett v. Barnett et al
as 1:2022cv00060
Defendant:
Ronnie Barnett, Bo, Tammie McCalpin and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy Ray Pickett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morelock v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of (PLR3)
as 2:2020cv00119
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Plaintiff:
Tammy Smith Morelock
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Smith v. Davol, Inc et al
as 2:2019cv02298
Plaintiff:
Tammy Smith
Defendant:
Davol, Inc and C.R. Bard Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. Menard, Inc. et al
as 3:2019cv00030
Plaintiff:
Tammy Smith
Defendant:
Menard, Inc., John Doe 1-2 Individuals and John Doe 3-6 Corporations
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. Menard, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv00404
Plaintiff:
Tammy Smith
Defendant:
Menard, Inc., John Doe 1-2 Individuals and John Doe 3-6 Corporations
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Odom v. Smith et al
as 5:2013cv00061
Plaintiff:
Glenn D. Odom, II
Defendant:
Tammy Smith, Raymond Vinson, Skyla Grief and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
John Smith, et al v. Brea Property Management of M, et al
as 10-1809
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN SMITH and TAMMY SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
BREA PROPERTY MANAGEMENT OF MICHIGAN LLC and BRE SOUTHFIELD LLC
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00518
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
