Cases 1 - 10 of 1,697
Ward (PS) v. Armijo et al
as 1:2024cv01256
Plaintiff:
Demontray Ward and Demontray Larell Ward
Defendant:
A. Armijo, Avery, T. Maine and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Saramosing Makayla v. Health Care Service Corporation et al
as 5:2024cv00453
Plaintiff:
Tinsley Ariana Taylor Saramosing Makayla
Defendant:
Health Care Service Corporation doing business as Blue Cross Blue Shield of Oklahoma and Does 1 to 50
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Lombardi v. Prosecution and Code Enforcement Office, et al
as 24-1183
Plaintiff:
KIKI LOMBARDI, AKA K. Kiki Whitaker-Lombard
Defendant:
PROSECUTION AND CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICE, West Colfax, DENVER PROBATION AND CASES, Case Level at Probation, DISTRICT ATTORNEYS OFFICE and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00180
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Taylor v. Owen Faricy Motor Company
as 1:2024cv00957
Plaintiff:
Scott Taylor
Defendant:
Owen Faricy Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Thayer v. Howard et al
as 5:2024cv03043
Plaintiff:
David W. Thayer
Defendant:
Laura Howard, Lindsey Dinkel, Christine Mohr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Community Health Development Partners LLC et al v. Osborne et al
as 5:2024cv00295
Plaintiff:
Community Health Development Partners LLC, CHDP Lake Havasu LLC, CHDP Pahrump LLC and others
Defendant:
Chris E Osborne, Taylor Horst and Bill Nelson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1085
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Bradford v. Taylor et al
as 1:2024cv00030
Plaintiff:
Slyvester Bradford and Sylvester Bradford
Defendant:
Devin Taylor, Ogden City Police Department, Ogden City and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
