Cases 11 - 20 of 1,405
Higgins v. Taylor County- Abilene, Texas et al
as 1:2024cv00029
Plaintiff:
Michael K Higgins
Defendant:
Taylor County- Abilene, Texas and 350th Court of Law
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Taylor v. Davis et al
as 9:2024cv00039
Plaintiff:
Quendell Taylor
Defendant:
James Davis, Christopher Farrell, J. Back and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Taylor v. Sayers et al
as 3:2024cv00346
Plaintiff:
GiorGio Taylor
Defendant:
Ethan Sayers, John Doe 1 and John Doe 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. Garland et al
as 3:2024cv00043
Plaintiff:
Jeremiah Taylor
Defendant:
Merrick Garland and O. Cobert
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Taylor v. Lozano et al
as 1:2024cv00011
Plaintiff:
Stephen D Taylor
Defendant:
J Lozano, John Doe #1 1:24-cv-11, John Doe #2 1:24-cv-11 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. LeBlanc
as 24-30015
Plaintiff:
Marion Taylor
Defendant:
James M. LeBlanc and Darrel Vannoy
Hulsey v. Bishop
as 24-10014
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Hulsey
Defendant:
Ricky Bishop, Sheriif, Taylor County Sheriff's Office, Andre Moore, Lieutenant, Taylor County Detention Center, N Wade and others
Sanders v. Myers et al
as 1:2024cv00013
Plaintiff:
Christopher G Sanders and Christopher George Sanders
Defendant:
Warden Marcus Myers, Heather Cormier, Jamie Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00310
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Haley v. Taylor County Detention Center
as 23-11269
Plaintiff:
Dennis Haley
Defendant:
Taylor County Detention Center, Ricky Bishop, Sheriff, FNU Norette, Chief and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
