Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Teal v. Teague et al
as 1:2021cv01058
Plaintiff:
(Inmate) Mark Teal and Mark Teal
Defendant:
Trinity Teague, Aaron Belsches, Jarret Kiefel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Yahweh v. Commonwealth of Virginia et al
as 1:2020cv01105
Plaintiff:
Yeshua Emanuel Yahweh, Robert Gabriel Love, Gabriel Alexander Antonio and others
Defendant:
Ms. Ansah, Foe Two, Carl K. Kester and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Herek v. The Old Dominion Club of Richmond et al
as 3:2020cv00119
Defendant:
Does 1-10, Michael Dickinson, Chris Kourdoglov and others
Plaintiff:
Teal Herek
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Herek v. Circle 2, Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv00058
Defendant:
Andreas Pyliaris, Does 1 through 10, William Pyliaris and others
Plaintiff:
Teal Herek
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Juul Labs, Inc. v. The Unincorporated Associations Identified in Schedule A
as 1:2019cv01126
Defendant:
The Unincorporated Associations Identified in Schedule A, Abdulrasool Ghulamhussain, Mohammed Jaber and others
Plaintiff:
Juul Labs, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Yahweh v. Clarke et al
as 1:2018cv01076
Defendant:
Ms. Ansah, Foe Two, Dr. Woodrow A. Myers and others
Plaintiff:
Yeshua Emanuel Yahweh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tabibi v. Luong, M.D. et al
as 1:2018cv00765
Plaintiff:
Shahab Tabibi
Defendant:
Dr. Luong, M.D., Bruce Teal, Vincent Goore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jehovah v. Clarke et al
as 1:2017cv01307
Plaintiff:
Jesus Emmanuel Jehovah
Defendant:
Harold W. Clarke, John M. Jabe, Arnold David Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Teal v. Commonwealth of Virginia
as 1:2016cv00721
Petitioner:
Mark Anthony Teal
Respondent:
Commonwealth of Virginia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Teal v. Commonwealth of Virginia
as 1:2016cv00443
Plaintiff:
Mark Teal
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Virginia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
