Cases 1 - 10 of 35
Hudson v. USA
as 3:2024cv00202
Petitioner:
Ice Tee Hudson
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Ford v. Pitt County Memorial Hospital Inc. et al
as 5:2024cv00071
Plaintiff:
Jarred J. Ford
Defendant:
Pitt County Memorial Hospital Inc. d/b/a ECU Health Inc., a/k/a Vidant Medical Center, Claudia E. Goettler, Michael R. Bard and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00174
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Hudson v. Streeval
as 7:2023cv00137
Petitioner:
Ice Tee Hudson
Respondent:
J.C. Streeval
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Broadcast Music, Inc v. Acapulco, Inc.
as 2:2022cv00147
Plaintiff:
Broadcast Music, Inc, Warner-Tamerlane Publishing Corp, Prodisc Music Company and others
Defendant:
Acapulco, Inc., Acapulco, Inc. doing business as Allure 30/30, Melvin Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 504 Copyright Infringement
Simms-Lewis v. Tee et al
as 1:2021cv02830
Plaintiff:
Raymond E. Simms-Lewis
Defendant:
Officer Ms. Tee, Warden Obello, Governor Larry Hogan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Tee Feral Golf, LLC v. MJM Golf, LLC
as 21-1648
Defendant / Appellee:
3G REAL ESTATE HOLDINGS, LLC, MJM GOLF, LLC and VIRGINIA ELECTRIC & POWER COMPANY, d/b/a Dominion Virginia Power
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TEE FERAL GOLF, LLC
US v. Ice Hudson
as 19-4544
Defendant / Appellant:
ICE TEE HUDSON
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-2387
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Olandio Workman v. Bill M.
as 17-2387
Defendant:
BILL M., CEO, Engineered Product Inc, MONTRE JETER, lead man, CHRIS MATTERN, co worker and others
Plaintiff:
OLANDIO RAY WORKMAN
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
