Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Lawrence Crawford v. Robert Hood
as 17-7410
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LAWRENCE CRAWFORD
Defendant - Appellee:
JUDGE ROBERT E. HOOD, TARA DAWN SHURLING, P.A., JUDGE ALBERT DIAZ and others
Smith v. McMaster et al
as 8:2017cv02549
Plaintiff:
Samuel N. Smith
Defendant:
Henry McMaster, Jean Toal, Rick Quinn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Yahya Muquit v. Robert Hood
as 17-7068
Plaintiff - Appellant:
YAHYA MUQUIT
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT E. HOOD, Judge, TARA DAWN SHURLING, Ms, PA, JUDGE ALBERT DIAZ and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2012cv03092
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Michael Singleton v. United State
as 11-7595
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL A. SINGLETON, f/k/a Michael A. Singleton, #1081861
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, NJ FEDERAL DISTRICT, 10 UNIDENTIFIED US MARSHALS and others
Defendant:
C. WESTON HOUCK, SC FEDERAL DISTRICT, GREENVILLE SC DISTRICT COURT and others
Singleton v. United States, The et al
as 8:2011cv01198
Plaintiff:
Michael A Singleton
Defendant:
United States, The, NJ Federal District, SC Federal District and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Singleton v. United States, The et al
as 2:2011cv01198
Plaintiff:
Michael A Singleton
Defendant:
United States, The, NJ Federal District, SC Federal District and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HOLMAN v. WOOTEN et al
as 2:2011mc00078
Plaintiff:
ROSLYN HOLMAN
Defendant:
TERRY L. WOOTEN, THOMAS E. ROGERS, III, SHARI L. STEFANO and others
Cause Of Action: Motion for Order
Type:
Other Statutes
Holman v. Wooten et al
as 1:2011mc00185
Defendant:
Cindy Lee Brunink/Brunink, Clemson University, Allyson K. Duncan and others
Plaintiff:
Roslyn Holman
Holman v. Wooten et al
as 4:2009cv01634
Plaintiff:
Roslyn Holman
Defendant:
Terry L Wooten, Thomas E Rogers, III, Shari L Stefano and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
