Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC v. 9.89 Acres of Land
as 23-2129
Plaintiff / Appellee:
MOUNTAIN VALLEY PIPELINE, LLC
Defendant / Appellant:
9.89 ACRES OF LAND, OWNED BY ELIZABETH LEE TERRY, a/k/a Elizabeth Lee Reynolds, a/k/a Elizabeth Terry Reynolds, Roanoke County Tax Map Parcel No. 110 00-0000 and Being MVP Parcel No. VA-RO-054
Reed v. Chambers et al
as 2:2022cv02158
Plaintiff:
Max Reed, II
Defendant:
Shannon Chambers and Terry Reynolds
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Clervrain et al v. Ebert et al
as 3:2022cv00168
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain, Emmanuel Benjoassaint, Kaity Borgella and others
Defendant:
Jhone Ebert, Charles Daniels, Ann Morgan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
REYNOLDS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv54324
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
TERRI REYNOLDS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Helen Armstrong v. Terry Reynolds, et al
as 20-15256
Defendant / Appellee:
TERRY REYNOLDS, LARA PELLEGRINI, JESS LANKFORD and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HELEN ARMSTRONG
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv02239
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv01418
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Armstrong v. Reynolds et al
as 2:2017cv02528
Plaintiff:
Helen Armstrong
Defendant:
Steve George, Jess Lankford, Lara Pellegrini and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv00069
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Reynolds v. St. Lawrence et al
as 4:2015cv00207
Petitioner:
Terry Reynolds
Respondent:
Al St. Lawrence, Khoney, Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
