Other Statutes Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 3,918
UFCW Local 1500 Welfare Fund et al v. Takeda Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv10030
Plaintiff: UFCW Local 1500 Welfare Fund, UFOA FAMILY PROTECTION PLAN LOCAL 854, UFOA FOR RETIRED FIRE OFFICERS FAMILY PROTECTION PLAN and others
Defendant: Takeda Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Halman Aldubi Provident and Pension Funds Ltd v. Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd, et al
as 23-8050
Respondent: GERALD FORSYTHE and ELI KALIF
Petitioner: TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LTD, EREZ VIGODMAN, EYAL DESHEH and others
Psagot Mutual Funds, Ltd. et al v. Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. et al
as 3:2023cv01211
Plaintiff: Psagot Mutual Funds, Ltd., Psagot Provident Funds & Pension Ltd., Migdal Mutual Funds, Ltd. and others
Defendant: Teva Pharmaceuticals Industries Ltd., Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Erez Vigodman and others
LOUISIANA WHOLESALE DRUG CO., INC. v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2012cv00995
Defendant: TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC., TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS, GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC formerly SmithKline Beecham Corp. d/b/a/ GlaxoSmithKline and others
Interested Party: MEIJER INC.
Amicus Curiae: FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
Lead Plaintiff: KING DRUG COMPANY OF FLORENCE, INC., LOUISIANA WHOLESALE DRUG CO., INC. and ROCHESTER DRUG CO-OPERATIVE, INC.
Not Yet Classified: MEIJER DISTRIBUTION, INC., MORRIS & DICKSON CO., L.L.C., FWK HOLDINGS LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
FWK Holdings LLC v. Shire PLC et al (Direct Purchaser Antitrust Class Action Complaint) We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv12653
Defendant: Shire PLC, Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Actavis Elizabeth LLC and others
Plaintiff: FWK Holdings LLC
Consolidated Plaintiff: Rochester Drug Co-Operative, Inc.
Intervenor Plaintiff: Meijer Distribution, Inc., Meijer, Inc. and BI-LO, LLC
Intervenor Defendant: Shire LLC and Shire US Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
City Of Lakewood v. Purdue Pharma L P et al
as 1:2018op45240
Defendant: McKesson Corporation, Endo Health Solutions, Inc., The Purdue Frederick Company Inc. and others
Plaintiff: City Of Lakewood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Marion County Board of County Commissioners v. AmerisourceBergen Drug Corporation et al
as 1:2018op45529
Defendant: McKesson Corporation, Actavis Pharma, Inc. f/k/a Watson Pharma, Inc., Purdue Pharma L.P. and others
Plaintiff: Marion County Board of County Commissioners
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
MSP Recovery Claims, Series LLC v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 1:2018op45091
Defendant: Allergan PLC, Actavis Pharma, Inc., Purdue Pharma L.P. and others
Plaintiff: MSP Recovery Claims, Series LLC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Chu v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 1:2018op45930
Defendant: Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., McKesson Corporation, Janssen Pharmaceuticals Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Jordan Chu
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
PROFESSIONAL DRUG COMPANY, INC. v. WYETH, INC. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2011cv05479
Defendant: WYETH LLC, WYETH, INC., WYETH PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. and others
Not Yet Classified: HEB GROCERY COMPANY LP, RITE AID CORPORATION, PAINTERS DISTRICT COUNCIL NO. 30 HEALTH & WELFARE FUND and others
Not Classified By Court: FAITH HOCHBERG
In Re: EFFEXOR XR ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Special Master: JONATHAN J. LERNER
Interested Party: IBEW -- NECA Local 505 Health & Welfare Plan, MC -- UA Local 119 Health & Welfare Plan, CADILA HEALTHCARE LIMITED and others
Plaintiff: Individual Direct Purchaser Plaintiffs and PROFESSIONAL DRUG COMPANY, INC.
Petitioner: TIMMY P. THIEN
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 Antitrust Litigation

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?