Cases 91 - 100 of 10,774
Geiger v. Lumpkin
as 24-40022
Petitioner:
Michael E. Geiger
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division and Laura Haney
Benton v. Texas Department Criminal Justice
as 4:2024cv00111
Plaintiff:
Cassandra Benton
Defendant:
Texas Department of Criminal Justice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mitchell v. Lumpkin
as 24-40018
Petitioner:
Joshua Wiley Mitchell
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Schubert v. Collier et al
as 1:2024cv00014
Plaintiff:
Christopher Francis Schubert
Defendant:
Executive Director Brian Collier, C.F. Hazelwood, Texas Department of Criminal Justice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Holland v. Lumpkin
as 24-10015
Petitioner:
Clarence Wyatt Holland
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Carter v. Lumpkin
as 24-40014
Petitioner:
Shamarcus Torrell Carter
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Johns v. Lumpkin
as 24-50014
Petitioner:
Jason Anthony Johns
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Bullock v. Lumpkin
as 24-20009
Petitioner:
Brian Bullock
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division and 184th District Court
Dillard v. Davis
as 24-10006
Plaintiff:
Daniel D. Dillard
Defendant:
Lorie Davis, Former Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Jimmy S. Smith, Senior Warden, Elbert G. Holmes, Former Assistant Warden and others
Watts v. Lumpkin
as 24-20004
Petitioner:
Bryant Christopher Watts
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
