Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Ronald Whitfield, et al v. Texas Children Memorial Herman, et al
as 19-20369
Defendant / Appellee:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY, BEHAVIORAL HOSPITALS OF BELLAIRE AND (UNKNOWN), CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION, CRIMINAL JUSTICE PAROLE DIVISION, HARRIS COUNTY TEXAS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RONALD DWAYNE WHITFIELD, Presumed Father, also known as Ronald Dwayne Whitfield, Prophet
Ronald Whitfield, et al v. TX Children Memorial Hermann, et al
as 19-20292
Defendant / Appellee:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY, BEHAVIORAL HOSPITALS OF BELLAIRE AND (UNKNOWN), CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION, CRIMINAL JUSTICE PAROLE DIVISION, HARRIS COUNTY TEXAS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRANDY BRENAY CHARLES-WHITFIELD, Mother, RONALD DWAYNE WHITFIELD, Presumed Father, also known as Ronald Dwayne Whitfield and K.L.W., a child
Amrhein v. United States of America, et al
as 4:2016cv00223
Plaintiff:
Darlene C Amrhein
Defendant:
United States of America, Barack Hussein Obama, Joseph Robinette Biden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Deaver v. Pope et al
as 3:2015cv02043
Plaintiff:
Frederic Scott Deaver
Defendant:
Ronald R. Pope, Caroline E. Baker, Chris Daniel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tom Rickhoff v. Seana Willing, et al
as 11-50411
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TOM RICKHOFF
Defendant - Appellee:
SEANA WILLING, Official Capacity as Member of the Texas State Commission on Judicial Conduct, JORGE C. RANGEL, Official Capacity as Member of the Texas State Commission on Judicial Conduct, JAN P PATTERSON, Official Capacity as Member of the Texas State Commission on Judicial Conduct and others
Jenevein v. Willing, et al
as 09-50064
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT JENEVEIN
Defendant - Appellee:
SEANA WILLING, Acting Executive Director of the Texas State Commission on Judicial Conduct, R C ALLEN, III, Member of the Texas State Commission on Judicial Conduct, ELIZABETH COATES, Member of the Texas State Commission on Judicial Conduct and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
