Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Dion Horton, et al v. Administrative Judge Jill Rangos, et al
as 24-1325
Plaintiff:
DION HORTON, DAMON JONES, CRAIG BROWNLEE and others
Defendant:
ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE JILL RANGOS, in her official capacity, FRANK J. SCHERER, DIRECTOR OF ADULT PROBATION AND PAROLE, in his official capacity, ANTHONY M. MARIANI, COURT OF COMMON PLEAS JUDGE and others
KAETZ v. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2022cv01003
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM F. KAETZ
Defendant:
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cruz v. Allegheny County Jail et al
as 1:2021cv00344
Defendant:
Guards, Hon. Maria N. Metzel, Warden and others
Plaintiff:
Abraham Cruz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BLACK v. COUNTY OF ALLEGHENY et al
as 2:2019cv00008
Defendant:
COUNTY OF ALLEGHENY, ALLEGHENY HEALTH NETWORK, ORLANDO HARPER and others
Plaintiff:
DANIEL CHARLES BLACK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
BULLS v. ALLEGHENY COUNTY JAIL et al
as 2:2018cv00738
Plaintiff:
DEWANN BULLS
Defendant:
ALLEGHENY COUNTY JAIL and FBI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
SMIERCIAK v. CITY OF PITTSBURGH POLICE DEPT. et al
as 2:2018cv00734
Plaintiff:
JOHN SMIERCIAK
Defendant:
CITY OF PITTSBURGH POLICE DEPT. , MICHAEL ANTONACE, JR , THOMAS MALONEY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv01671
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv01675
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv01398
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv01048
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
