Antitrust Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 115
Walgreen CO et al v. Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited et al
as 1:2023cv13061
Plaintiff: WALGREEN CO, The Kroger Co., Albertsons Companies, Inc. and others
Defendant: Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited and Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
In re Bystolic Antitrust Litigation
as 23-418
Debtor: In re: Watson Laboratories, Inc.
Plaintiff: J M Smith Corporation, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated, DBA Smith Drug Company, KPH Healthcare Services, Inc., individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated also known as Kinney Drugs, Inc, UFCW local 1500 Welfare Fund and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: Albertsons Companies, Inc., H-E-B L.P., The Kroger Co. and others
Defendant / Appellee: Forest Laboratories Inc., Forest Laboratories Ireland, LTD, Forest Laboratories Holdings Ltd. and others
In re Bystolic Antitrust Litigation
as 23-410
Debtor: In re: Watson Laboratories, Inc.
Plaintiff / Appellant: CVS Pharmacy, Inc., Rite Aid Corporation, Rite Aid Hdqtrs. Corp. and others
Defendant / Appellee: Forest Laboratories Inc., Forest Laboratories Ireland, LTD, Forest Laboratories Holdings Ltd. and others
In re Bystolic Antitrust Litigation
as 23-420
Debtor: In re: Watson Laboratories, Inc.
Plaintiff: J M Smith Corporation, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated, DBA Smith Drug Company, KPH Healthcare Services, Inc., individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated also known as Kinney Drugs, Inc, Albertsons Companies, Inc. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: UFCW local 1500 Welfare Fund, Teamsters Western Region & Local 177 Health Care Plan, Fraternal Order Of Police Miami Lodge 20, Insurance Trust Fund and others
Defendant / Appellee: Forest Laboratories Inc., Forest Laboratories Ireland, LTD, Forest Laboratories Holdings Ltd. and others
In re: In re Bystolic Antitrust Litigation
as 23-423
Debtor: In re: Watson Laboratories, Inc.
Plaintiff: UFCW local 1500 Welfare Fund, Teamsters Western Region & Local 177 Health Care Plan, Fraternal Order Of Police Miami Lodge 20, Insurance Trust Fund and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: J M Smith Corporation, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated, DBA Smith Drug Company and KPH Healthcare Services, Inc., individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated also known as Kinney Drugs, Inc
Defendant / Appellee: Forest Laboratories Inc., Forest Laboratories Ireland, LTD, Forest Laboratories Holdings Ltd. and others
Whalen et al v. Albertsons Companies Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2023cv00459
Plaintiff: Christine Whalen, Katherine Arcell, Jose Brito and others
Defendant: Albertsons Companies Inc., Kroger Co. and Cerberus Capital Management L.P.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
DC, et al v. Kroger Co., et al
as 22-7168
Plaintiff / Appellant: District of Columbia, State of California and State of Illinois
Defendant / Appellee: Kroger Co. and Albertsons Companies, Inc.
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al v. KROGER CO. et al
as 1:2022cv03357
Plaintiff: DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA and STATE OF ILLINOIS
Defendant: KROGER CO. and ALBERTSONS COMPANIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
The Kroger Co. et al v. Cargill, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 0:2022cv02449
Defendant: Cargill Meat Solution, Cargill Inc, Cargill Protein and others
Plaintiff: The Kroger Co., Hy-Vee, Save Mart Supermarkets and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
The Kroger Co. et al v. Cargill, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2022cv00089
Defendant: Cargill Meat Solution, Cargill, Inc., Cargill Protein and others
Plaintiff: The Kroger Co., Hy-Vee, Save Mart Supermarkets and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?