Cases 1 - 10 of 48
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-2966
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-1837
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00004
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Brian Davis, et al v. George Wigen, et al
as 21-3162
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRIAN A. DAVIS and FREDRICKA K. BECKFORD
Defendant / Appellee:
GEORGE C. WIGEN, Former Warden, Moshannon Valley Correctional Center, GEO GROUP INC, DONNA MELLENDICK, Former Administrator, Bureau of Prisons Privatization Management Branch and others
QUINTO v. WARDEN, MOSHANNON VALLEY CORRECTIONAL CENTER
as 3:2020cv00073
Respondent:
WARDEN, MOSHANNON VALLEY CORRECTIONAL CENTER
Petitioner:
LIBARDO QUINTO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Quinto v. Warden, Moshannon Valley Correctional Center
as 3:2020cv00620
Respondent:
Warden, Moshannon Valley Correctional Center
Petitioner:
Libardo Quinto
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Quinto v. Warden, Moshannon Valley Correctional Center
as 6:2020cv00549
Respondent:
Warden, Moshannon Valley Correctional Center
Petitioner:
Libardo Quinto
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Theophilus Akwei v. BOP, et al
as 20-1604
Defendant / Appellee:
DR. ZIMMERLY, GEO GROUP INC, BUREAU OF PRISONS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
THEOPHILUS AKWEI
Roberto Beras v. Warden Moshannon Valley Correc
as 20-1092
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN MOSHANNON VALLEY CORRECTIONAL CENTER
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERTO BERAS
MARIE v. MOSHANNON VALLEY CORRECTIONAL CENTER et al
as 3:2019cv00104
Defendant:
S.M. KUTA, UNITED STATES OF AMAERICA, D. JONES and others
Plaintiff:
NGONO ANDRE MARIE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
