Cases 1 - 10 of 37
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02143
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00368
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e-2e Job Discrimination (Unlawful Employment Practices)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv04944
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Meng v. The New School
as 1:2023cv03851
Plaintiff:
Lily Meng
Defendant:
The New School
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00128
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1415 Individuals with Disabilities Education Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00118
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-363
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Aubrey et al v. The New School
as 1:2021cv04915
Plaintiff:
Snow Xuecan Ye, Lydia K. Crouse, Rae Lavande Pelleri and others
Defendant:
The New School
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 bc
Percy et al v. Manhattan Telecommunications Corporation et al
as NYE/1:21-CV-02311
Defendant:
Manhattan Telecommunications Corporation, Milford Management, Opengate Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Percy, Albert E. Percy and Percy Jobs and Careers Corporation
Percy et al v. Manhattan Telecommunications Corporation et al
as 1:2021cv02311
Defendant:
Manhattan Telecommunications Corporation, Milford Management, Opengate Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Albert E. Percy and Percy Jobs and Careers Corporation an IRC 501(c)(3) non-profit, as Class Representatives, Albert E. Percy and Percy Jobs and Careers Corporation
Respondent:
James M. Kernan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
