Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Kozak et al v. Archer Daniels Midland Co. et al
as 5:2022cv02018
Plaintiff:
Alan Kozak, Sharon Kozak and Kozak's Jersey Dairy doing business as Clover Patch Dairy
Defendant:
Archer Daniels Midland Co. doing business as ADM Animal Nutrition, Milk Specialties Co. and Kevin Steele
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Melton et al v. Great Plains Manufacturing, Incorporated
as 3:2022cv00161
Plaintiff:
David B. Melton, 247 Farms, Inc. and Pea Patch Road Farms LLP
Defendant:
Great Plains Manufacturing, Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Aceves et al v. Volkswagen Group of America, Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv06078
Plaintiff:
Jenna Aceves , Juan Alas , Ron Alcalay and others
Defendant:
Volkswagen Group of America, Inc. and Volkswagen Aktiengesellschaft
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301
Pumpkin Patch, LLP, The v. Syngenta Corporation et al
as 2:2015cv07384
Plaintiff:
Pumpkin Patch, LLP, The
Defendant:
Syngenta Corporation , Syngenta Seeds, Inc. , Syngenta Biotechnology, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Pumpkin Patch, LLP, The v. Syngenta Corporation et al
as 0:2015cv01072
Plaintiff:
Pumpkin Patch, LLP, The
Defendant:
Syngenta Corporation , Syngenta Seeds, Inc. , Syngenta Biotechnology, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Oliver et al v. Knauf Gips KG et al
as 2:2009cv06509
Plaintiff:
Patches Oliver, Patches Oliver, Richard Oliver and others
Defendant:
Knauf Gips KG, Knauf Plasterboard Tianjin Co., Ltd., Knauf Plasterboard Wuhu Co., Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Oliver et al v. Knauf Gips KG et al
as 1:2009cv00645
Plaintiff:
Patches Oliver and Richard Oliver
Defendant:
Knauf Gips KG, Knauf Plasterboard (Tianjin) Co., Ltd., Knauf Plasterboard (Wuhu) Co., Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
