Cases 11 - 20 of 16,911
Henry Stubbs, III v. USA, et al
as 24-1735
Plaintiff:
HENRY CHRISTOPHER STUBBS, III
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, YVETTE KANE, C. DARNELL JONES, II and others
Davenport v. United States of America
as 3:2024cv00693
Plaintiff:
Carol Davenport
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Ronaldo Elias Da Silva, et al v. Attorney General United States of America
as 24-1755
Petitioner:
RONALDO ELIAS DA SILVA, CRISTINA APARECIDA DE LANA SILVA, E. R.D.S and others
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
HOWARD v. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2024cv05434
Petitioner:
RICHARD HOWARD
Respondent:
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Isaac Carranza-Cortez, et al v. Attorney General United States of America
as 24-1724
Petitioner:
ISAAC DE JESUS CARRANZA-CORTEZ, ZULMA ELIZABETH QUINTEROS-DE CARRANZA and E. M. C.-Q.
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
CHENG v. BYRD et al
as 1:2024cv05345
Plaintiff:
SHENG-WEN CHENG
Defendant:
K. BYRD, JAMES A. GIBBS, THOMAS J. GUBBIOTTI, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GOODE v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2024cv01668
Plaintiff:
JAMES GOODE
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
MANENTE v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE et al
as 2:2024cv05323
Plaintiff:
VITO MANENTE
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, IRS and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Recovery of IRS Tax
Jose Collado-Lantigua v. Attorney General United States of America
as 24-1721
Petitioner:
JOSE DANNY COLLADO-LANTIGUA
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Kevin Marsh v. Attorney General United States of America
as 24-1722
Petitioner:
KEVIN ANTHONY MARSH
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
