Cases filed in the Third Circuit Courts
Cases 41 - 50 of 16,946
CAMPBELL v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2024cv05642
Plaintiff: DAMON CAMPBELL
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
James Johnson v. USA
as 24-1747
Plaintiff: JAMES LAMONT JOHNSON
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
M&T Bank v. Chryssoula Arsenis, et al
as 24-1723
Plaintiff: M&T BANK, other Hudson City Savings Bank
Defendant: CHRYSSOULA ARSENIS, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, STATE OF NEW JERSEY and others
Ronaldo Elias Da Silva, et al v. Attorney General United States of America
as 24-1755
Petitioner: RONALDO ELIAS DA SILVA, CRISTINA APARECIDA DE LANA SILVA, E. R.D.S and others
Respondent: ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
VERGARA v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2024cv05555
Defendant: REGINA INEZ PEOPLES, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, MERRICK B. GARLAND and others
Plaintiff: LUIS EDUARDO VERGARA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
RIZK v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2024cv05590
Petitioner: WISAM RIZK
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv05593
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
ANTHONY v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2024cv00116
Plaintiff: SCOTT A. ANTHONY
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
VILLAGE SUPER MARKET, INC. v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2024cv02106
Plaintiff: VILLAGE SUPER MARKET, INC.
Defendant: UNITED STATE OF AMERICA and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7422 IRS: Refund Taxes
Henry Stubbs, III v. USA, et al
as 24-1735
Plaintiff: HENRY CHRISTOPHER STUBBS, III
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, YVETTE KANE, C. DARNELL JONES, II and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?