Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Clapp v. Tobin, et al
as 22-1350
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KEVIN S. CLAPP
Defendant:
CHARLES DUANE BAKER, JR., Governor of Massachusetts, MICHAEL W. MORRISSEY, Norfolk County District Attorney, RICHARD D. MCKEON, Massachusetts State Police (Retired) and others
Defendant / Appellee:
TROOPER BRUCE TOBIN, Norfolk County District Attorney's Office, TROOPER SCOTT KEARNS, Norfolk County District Attorney's Office, SGT. BRIAN BROOKS, Norfolk County District Attorney's Office and others
Budnick v. Ludlow Police Department et al
as 3:2016mc93004
Plaintiff:
Thomas P. Budnick
Defendant:
Ludlow Police Department, Westwood Police Department, West Harwich Police Department and others
Budnick v. Doe, et al
as 14-1560
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS P. BUDNICK
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN DOE, Ludlow Police Officer, Individually and in the scope of his authority, MARY DOE, Ludlow Police Officer, Individually and in the scope of her authority, JOHN DOE, Harwich Police Officer, Individually and in the scope of his authority and others
DESPOSITO v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 2:2014cv01641
Plaintiff:
SONNY DESPOSITO
Defendant:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, BERGEN COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE, JOHN L. MOLINELLI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Budnick v. Doe et al
as 3:2014cv30001
Plaintiff:
Thomas P. Budnick
Defendant:
John Doe , Mary Doe , Ludlow Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Budnick v. Ludlow Police Officer John Doe et al
as 3:2013mc93023
Plaintiff:
Thomas P. Budnick
Defendant:
Ludlow Police Officer John Doe, Ludlow Police Officer Mary Doe, Ludlow Police Department and others
Budnick v. Ludlow Police Officer John Doe et al
as 3:2013mc93022
Petitioner:
Thomas P. Budnick
Defendant:
Ludlow Police Officer John Doe, Ludlow Police Officer Mary Doe, Ludlow Police Department and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
